Williamson County, Texas Criminal and Juvenile Defense Lawyer

WHAT IS AN INSTITUTIONAL PAROLE OFFICER: A TEXAS PAROLE ATTORNEY EXPLAINS

Having talked to many inmates and the families that love them in my practice as a Central Texas Parole Attorney, I am well aware that much of the parole process can seem confusing and chaotic.  Several routine portions of that process can take the inmate and or the family by surprise, leaving them frustrated, confused, and needlessly worried.

And of all of these portions of the process, the role of the Institutional Parole Officer or “IPO” confuses people the most.

Each unit in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, or “TDCJ”, has one or more IPOs.  A few months before a given person comes before the parole board for consideration, the IPO is tasked with gathering information on the person and creating a parole file for them.  This file is what the Parole Board reviews when making their decision.

As part of the information gathering process the IPO will interview the incarcerated person, asking about what programs he/she has participated in, what work he/she has done around the jail, what plans he/she has for release and the like.  This interview often scares the person and worries their family because the IPO gives their opinion on whether or not the person is likely to be granted parole and what conditions, if any the person might have to fulfill.

The problem is not that the IPO’s opinion is scary, but that many IPOs, in fact, the vast majority that have interviewed my clients, state their opinions as if they were fact.  They interact with the client as if the IPO was himself/herself a member of the Parole Board.

They are not.  It is important to understand that the IPO has NO decision-making authority.  None.  Not a single bit.  In Texas only the Parole Board decides whether or not the incarcerated person is granted parole.  Now, the IPO may have a lot of experience in TDCJ.  They may have been doing their job a long time.  They may have spoken with many inmates.  They may speak with authority and know lots of large and complex words and phrases relating to prison and parole.  Even so, they do not and cannot accurately and consistently predict what the Parole Board is likely to do, no matter how much they may believe they can.

Why?  Because the Parole Board is broken up into several subdivisions and each subdivision reviews files from many different prison units.  A given Parole Board office may review the files of all persons incarcerated at twenty or more different prison units.  Thus, even if an individual IPO managed to monitor and follow the outcome of every person in their unit, something that would leave IPOs with very little time to do much else, they still would see only a drop in the bucket of all the cases before their subdivision of the Parole Board.

Now, of course, it is important to be polite and respectful to the IPO since they still have the file and the IPO will write a report/recommendation that will go in the file for review by the parole board.  But when dealing with the IPO it is important not ot let their opinions overly concern you.  Simply discuss the interview with your parole attorney to help you put the interview into proper perspective.

In addition to the interview, the IPO will gather all of the information that the particular unit where the IPO is assigned and that TDCJ in general has on the incarcerated person for the file they send to the parole board.  A skilled parole lawyer can give you advice on steps you can take to make sure the information in your unit and TDCJ records is as positive and helpful as possible given the resources available to you and the particular programs and processes at your particular unit.

If you have more questions or concerns about your IPO or any part of the parole process please feel free to contact me.


     

Disclaimer: This blog is opinion and made available by The Law Office of John C. Prezas for informational purposes only. The information herein is not legal advice and cannot substitute for the advice of a skilled attorney. Reading this blog and following any advice herein does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. The best outcomes result from individualized strategies developed by your attorney specifically tailored to your case. For legal advice specifically tailored to the facts of your case you need to retain a lawyer.

Pathways Youth Ranch—Williamson County, Texas, Juvenile Placements: A Juvenile Defense Attorney Explains

This blog post is the second in a series of posts discussing the various placements to which juveniles adjudicated of delinquent conduct in the Williamson County Juvenile Court may be sent.  You can find the previous post about Brookhaven Youth Ranch here. As an experienced Juvenile Defense Attorney, I understand how important it is to…

Drinking on an Empty Stomach versus a Fully Belly: A DWI Defense Attorney Explains

We’ve all heard the old adage that you are more likely to get drunk on an empty stomach than a full stomach.  As a DWI Defense Attorney who has negotiated and litigated many DWI charges in a wide variety of circumstances, I’ve certainly heard this claim many times.  It’s not wrong, exactly, but it is…

Missouri v. McNeely: Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Latest Opinion on Blood Draws in DWI Cases

This week, on April 17, 2013, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its judgment in Missouri v. Mcneely, a case where the court was asked to decide whether the mere fact that the human body metabolizes alcohol at a steady rate provided enough of an emergency or exigency to allow police officers…

About the Author
John C. Prezas is a Harvard Law School graduate and criminal defense attorney in Georgetown, Texas. John worked as both a felony and a misdemeanor prosecutor for six years in Williamson County, Texas. John is also a writer and lecturer on the subjects of criminal law and criminal appellate law.
Read More About John »
Disclaimer
This blog is published for informational purposes only; it contains no legal advice whatsoever. Publication of this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship. This blog strives to be unbiased in its reporting. All information on this blog should be checked for its accuracy and current applicability. This blog is published by the Law Office of John C. Prezas. John C. Prezas defends the residents of Central Texas against a variety of criminal charges.

This website is made available by The Law Office of John C. Prezas for informational purposes only and information herein is not legal advice. The information provided herein cannot substitute for the advice of a skilled attorney. The materials on this website might not reflect the most current legal developments or verdicts. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is different and outcomes depend on a variety of factors. The best outcomes result from individualized strategies developed by your attorney specifically tailored to your case. Persons should not act upon information on this website without seeking professional legal counsel.The transmission and receipt of information contained on this website does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Communications with The Law Office of John C. Prezas via this website or via email do not establish an attorney-client relationship. Until The Law Office of John C. Prezas has formally established an attorney-client relationship with you, do NOT send any confidential information.